EUDR Monitoring: How to Track Deforestation and Ensure Compliance

The European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) introduces a transformative shift in global supply chains. It requires businesses to ensure that products placed on the EU market are free from deforestation and forest degradation. One of the most critical components of this regulation is effective monitoring, the ability to track the origin and status of forested areas used in commodity production.

This article explains how EUDR monitoring works, what data and technologies are involved, and how companies can implement practical processes to stay compliant. Whether you’re a supplier, processor, importer, or sustainability officer, this guide offers clarity and actionable insight for navigating EUDR requirements confidently.

What Is EUDR and Why Monitoring Matters

Effective monitoring is central to EUDR compliance. It is not an optional step but a core obligation under the regulation. To meet legal requirements, companies must ensure that their supply chains are fully traceable and backed by spatial data that proves the absence of deforestation or forest degradation.

EUDR at a Glance

The European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) applies to specific commodities that are considered high risk for contributing to global deforestation. The regulation requires that these goods are not sourced from land subject to deforestation or forest degradation after December 31, 2020.

EUDR covers the following commodities and their derivatives:

• Wood.
• Cattle.
• Palm oil.
• Soy.
• Cocoa.
• Coffee.
• Rubber.

Depending on their role, companies must fulfill different obligations:

• Operators are entities that place regulated products on the EU market for the first time or export them.
• Traders deal with regulated products already circulating within the EU.

Deadlines for compliance are as follows:

• December 30, 2025: General compliance deadline for most companies.
• June 30, 2026: Extended deadline for small and micro-enterprises.
• December 31, 2020: Deforestation cut-off date for all commodities.

Please note: Timber and timber-derived products produced before June 29, 2023 are still subject to the EU Timber Regulation (EUTR) if they are placed on the EU market between December 30, 2025 and December 30, 2028. After this transitional period, starting from December 31, 2028, all such products will fall under the scope of the EUDR, regardless of their production date.

All companies subject to EUDR must submit a Due Diligence Statement (DDS) and maintain transparent, verifiable traceability records that prove the legality and environmental compliance of each product.

Monitoring as a Compliance Cornerstone

Monitoring is the process of verifying whether a commodity has been produced on land that remained free of deforestation or degradation after the EUDR cut-off date. It involves identifying forest type, observing any structural changes, and ensuring legal compliance based on the production location.

According to EUDR definitions:

• Deforestation refers to the conversion of forest to agricultural use.
• Degradation refers to a structural change in forest type – for example, converting primary or naturally regenerating forests into plantation forests or other wooded land.

This means that even if trees are still present, a change in forest classification can qualify as degradation under the law. Therefore, accurate and timely monitoring is essential. It allows companies to detect land use changes, document forest conditions, and ensure that products meet the regulation’s criteria before entering the EU market.

Monitoring is not just about avoiding penalties – it is a proactive tool that supports sustainable sourcing, risk mitigation, and long-term access to European markets.

Key Monitoring Requirements Under EUDR

To comply with the EUDR, companies must gather and manage specific types of data that prove the origin and legality of their commodities. Monitoring requirements focus primarily on spatial information and legal documentation that demonstrate the absence of deforestation or degradation after the regulatory cut-off date.

Geolocation and Traceability

Each product shipment must include accurate geolocation data for the plot of land where the commodity was grown or harvested. This usually involves submitting GPS coordinates, polygon boundaries, or compatible spatial files that define the exact area of production.

The provided coordinates must match the actual location and reflect activity that occurred after December 31, 2020. If a product batch includes raw materials from multiple plots, geolocation data must be collected for each one individually.

Traceability also requires linking every origin plot to a specific shipment or product batch. This ensures that compliant and non-compliant sources are not mixed during storage, transport, or processing. Maintaining this connection throughout the supply chain is essential for fulfilling EUDR due diligence obligations.

Evidence of Forest Status and Legality

In addition to spatial data, companies must present credible evidence that the land associated with a commodity remained free from deforestation or degradation after the cut-off date. 

Acceptable forms of documentation may include:

• Satellite imagery showing no recent clearing.
• Land use maps or vegetation cover indices.
• Official documents verifying land ownership and legal harvesting rights.
• Proof of compliance with applicable national laws, including labor protections, indigenous rights, and environmental regulations.

This information must be complete, verifiable, and stored in a way that enables timely retrieval for audits or regulatory review. Reliable documentation supports risk assessment and strengthens the credibility of the due diligence process.

Technologies for EUDR Monitoring

Modern EUDR monitoring relies on digital technologies that enable companies to observe forest changes across large areas with accuracy and consistency. These tools support due diligence by providing timely geospatial data, improving traceability, and automating parts of the compliance process. This section outlines the key categories of technologies that help businesses meet EUDR requirements efficiently and reliably.

Satellite Imagery and Remote Sensing

High-resolution satellite imagery is a foundational tool for forest monitoring. It allows companies to detect and verify landscape changes that may indicate deforestation or degradation.

These tools can identify:

• Canopy cover loss.
• Land clearing, fires, and disturbances.
• Signs of degradation such as road construction or selective logging.

In addition to annual deforestation change detection, some platforms offer near-real-time alerts that help businesses track developments on the ground as they happen. This enables faster risk identification and allows for early intervention when non-compliant activity is suspected.

GIS and Data Platforms

Geospatial Information Systems (GIS) integrate multiple data layers to create a detailed, visual representation of forest conditions and land use classifications.

Key features include:

• Mapping of primary forest areas and buffer zones.
• Visualization of tree height and canopy density.
• Classification of other wooded lands (OWL) versus agricultural or plantation areas.

Interactive data platforms, such as those based on open-access forest datasets, allow users to monitor forest changes over time and flag high-risk areas. These tools are essential for aligning remote observations with EUDR forest type definitions and for producing consistent, verifiable evidence for compliance.

Digital Traceability Systems

Alongside spatial data, EUDR compliance depends on the ability to manage, store, and verify large volumes of documentation. Digital traceability systems play a key role in organizing supply chain data and integrating it into the due diligence workflow.

These systems can:

• Collect and store GPS coordinates, production dates, and legal documents.
• Link supplier data with ERP and procurement platforms.
• Automatically generate Due Diligence Statements (DDS) and flag high-risk suppliers.

By centralizing information and automating compliance steps, these tools reduce the administrative burden of EUDR monitoring and support real-time decision-making across multi-origin supply chains.

Challenges in Monitoring for EUDR

While technological solutions for monitoring are improving, implementing EUDR requirements in real-world supply chains presents several challenges. These include issues of forest classification, timing of degradation, and data gaps among smallholders and blended commodity flows. Understanding these limitations is essential for building effective and risk-aware monitoring systems.

Forest Type Definitions and Interpretation

The EUDR defines several forest categories, including primary forest, naturally regenerating forest, plantation forest, and other wooded land. In practice, distinguishing between these types is not always straightforward.

Situations that may complicate classification include:

• Naturally regenerating forests that visually resemble plantations.
• Agroforestry systems that may be reclassified as agricultural land.
• Rapid vegetation regrowth in tropical regions that hides earlier deforestation.

Because of these ambiguities, companies are encouraged to apply conservative assumptions when classification is uncertain. This reduces the risk of false compliance and strengthens the integrity of due diligence decisions.

Delayed Degradation and Hidden Conversion

Degradation is not always visible at the moment of harvest or initial assessment. A plot may appear compliant during a due diligence review but later undergo structural changes, such as conversion to plantation or agricultural use.

To mitigate this risk, companies should:

• Rely on the best available satellite and field data at the time of sourcing.
• Thoroughly document land conditions during procurement.
• Implement ongoing monitoring to detect post-harvest changes.

Since EUDR due diligence is time-bound, degradation that occurs after submission of a Due Diligence Statement (DDS) may not be captured, making proactive monitoring even more critical.

Blended Commodities and Smallholder Data Gaps

Monitoring and traceability become significantly more complex when commodities from different origins are blended during storage or transport, such as in silos, tanks, or bulk containers. Under EUDR, each component must be traceable to its source since the last complete emptying of the storage unit. This requirement often conflicts with standard inventory methods like FIFO (First-In, First-Out) and demands more granular documentation.

In addition, many smallholder producers operate in low-tech environments and face structural barriers to compliance. Without adequate support, they may be excluded from EU supply chains despite following sustainable practices.

Typical traceability and data challenges in these contexts include:

• Difficulty tracking batch origins after blending in shared storage.
• Inventory systems that are incompatible with EUDR-level granularity.
• Lack of GPS or polygon data from smallholder farms.
• Limited access to digital tools or internet infrastructure.
• Incomplete legal documentation, even when production is environmentally sound.

Addressing these challenges requires a combination of supplier engagement, digital infrastructure, and targeted technical support. Without this, smallholders may be disproportionately impacted by compliance efforts, and businesses may struggle to meet traceability requirements in blended sourcing models.

Step-by-Step EUDR Monitoring Process

Implementing effective monitoring under the EUDR requires more than just collecting data, it involves establishing a structured, repeatable process that ensures traceability, risk management, and legal defensibility. The steps below outline a practical approach companies can follow to meet EUDR monitoring obligations with clarity and control.

1. Identify In-Scope Products and Plots

Begin by listing all products and raw materials that fall under the scope of the EUDR. Use the Harmonized System (HS) codes listed in Annex I of the regulation to determine which commodities are affected. This typically includes wood, soy, cocoa, palm oil, rubber, cattle, and coffee, along with many of their derived products.

For each product, identify its origin by pinpointing the exact farm, forest plot, or harvesting site. This is the foundation for all further traceability efforts and must be established with precision to avoid ambiguity later in the due diligence process.

2. Collect and Validate Geospatial Data

Once the relevant plots have been identified, gather geolocation data for each one. This can include GPS coordinates, polygons, or shape files that define the physical boundaries of the land used for production.

Validation is essential. Use GPS collection tools or remote sensing platforms to confirm that the data accurately reflects the real-world location. Cross-reference this information with land-use maps or protected area overlays to determine whether the plot falls within high-risk zones for deforestation or legal conflict. If so, enhanced scrutiny may be required in later stages.

3. Monitor Forest Changes

Monitoring does not end once a plot is identified – it must be continuous. Use satellite imagery and near-real-time alert systems to observe forest conditions over time. Look for indicators of disturbance such as tree cover loss, fire scars, or land clearing, especially in periods following harvest.

Document all findings and store visual or analytical evidence as part of the product’s traceability record. This information can serve as proof that no deforestation or degradation has occurred since the EUDR cut-off date (December 31, 2020), and can help identify emerging risks before they affect compliance status.

4. Link Monitoring with Due Diligence

Integrate monitoring results into your broader EUDR due diligence process. If satellite or field data reveal evidence of deforestation or raise uncertainty, you must conduct a risk assessment and, where necessary, implement mitigation measures. These could include excluding the plot, requesting more documentation, or verifying regeneration through future monitoring.

Only after confirming that there is no more than negligible risk may a Due Diligence Statement (DDS) be submitted for that product batch. Monitoring is not a separate process from due diligence, it is the data-driven backbone that supports compliance decisions.

Best Practices for Reliable EUDR Monitoring

Complying with the EUDR is not just about technical accuracy, it’s about building trust, reducing legal risk, and maintaining uninterrupted access to the EU market. 

The following best practices support proactive, scalable monitoring and help ensure that companies remain audit-ready while minimizing exposure to future penalties.

Use Conservative Assumptions in Unclear Risk Areas

When geospatial data is ambiguous, for example, when a canopy loss signal is partial, or when reforestation patterns obscure previous clearing companies should err on the side of caution.

Treating these plots as potentially high-risk until verified minimizes the chance of accidental non-compliance. It also demonstrates a risk-aware approach during regulatory audits and builds confidence with business partners.

For instance, a regenerated plot in a tropical region may appear forested from above, but if prior clearing cannot be ruled out, it should be classified as uncertain and flagged for additional verification.

Integrate Third-Party Verification as a Support Layer

While EUDR does not formally accept certification schemes as direct proof, external assessments can significantly reinforce your compliance system. Independent satellite analyses, forest audits, or legal reviews by accredited experts help strengthen due diligence and reduce the burden on internal teams.

Used strategically, third-party insights can:

• Identify risk patterns across supplier groups.
• Fill data gaps when internal capacity is limited.
• Reduce the documentation workload and improve consistency.

This external input provides a safety net for your monitoring process and increases credibility in the eyes of auditors and regulators.

Choose Scalable, Integrated Monitoring Systems

Initial EUDR monitoring is often managed through spreadsheets or disconnected tools. However, this approach becomes unsustainable as supply chains grow in complexity and batch-level monitoring becomes routine.

To future-proof your compliance efforts, invest in integrated systems that:

• Handle spatial data, traceability documents, and risk scoring in one platform.
• Automate DDS generation and flag high-risk inputs.
• Scale as operations expand or as regulations evolve.

For example, a centralized dashboard that combines GPS inputs, land-use classifications, and real-time alerts allows for quicker, more informed decisions while reducing manual workload.

Digital Solutions for Scalable EUDR Monitoring

EUDR.co offers a specialized digital compliance platform that enables companies to meet the EU Deforestation Regulation’s monitoring and traceability requirements with precision and efficiency. Designed to handle geospatial data, risk assessments, and documentation workflows, the platform simplifies EUDR implementation across complex, multi-origin supply chains.

By integrating satellite analytics, GIS tools, and automated Due Diligence Statement (DDS) generation, EUDR.co helps organizations detect deforestation risks in near real time and maintain audit-ready records. Its flexible infrastructure supports both SMEs and large enterprises, making it a scalable solution for businesses aiming to align with EUDR’s traceability and legality standards.

Conclusion

EUDR monitoring is not just a legal obligation it is a strategic advantage. By implementing systems that consistently track forest status using accurate data, companies ensure compliance while reinforcing environmental responsibility.

Verifying and documenting deforestation-free sourcing is now essential for maintaining access to the EU market. It also plays a key role in demonstrating transparency and due diligence to regulators, investors, and customers.

For professionals in procurement, sustainability, and compliance, robust monitoring is a practical investment. It strengthens risk management, builds trust across the supply chain, and prepares businesses for future environmental regulations.

As expectations for supply chain accountability continue to grow, companies that embed monitoring into their operations today will be better equipped to lead tomorrow.

FAQ